Attorneys

Miller-Meeks’ Lawyer: Request for Rejected Poll “Regular Due Diligence” – The Day by day Nonpareil

In Hart’s election campaign, 22 ballot papers were identified that were claimed to have been cast legally, but were not counted due to mistakes made by election officials. If the 22 ballots had been counted, Hart of Wheatland would have won by nine votes.

The Miller-Meeks legal team filed a dismissal motion last month, arguing that “more than a century of precedent” required Hart to exhaust all state-level appeals before taking her case to Congress.

However, the federal law of 1969, according to which Hart questions the election result, does not require that all state legal challenges be exhausted. The house is not necessarily bound by previous precedents, either.

Miller-Meeks attorney Alan Ostergren has argued that Hart failed to demonstrate that she was entitled to the seat, arguing that her attorneys “selected” ballots in her favor, which are routine election administration issues. However, Miller-Meeks’ motion to dismiss did not contain any additional untold votes.

When asked if their campaign was looking for more votes in the race to ultimately be counted, Ostergren said, “Legally, we’re not at that point right now.”

Ostergren said the county auditors’ request for copies of rejected ballots was part of normal “due diligence” and an “ongoing process” that deals with the legal and factual claims made through Hart’s campaign.

Related Articles